Bingen, Wash.-based Insitu, a Boeing subsidiary, has agreed to pay $ 25 million to settle allegations that it used recycled parts rather than new parts in military drones, the Justice Department announced today.
The parts were put into drones that Insitu built for the US Special Operations Command and the Department of the Navy between 2009 and 2017, according to the US Attorney’s Office for the Western District of Washington.
When Insitu was awarded the contracts to supply the drones, under the terms of no-bid contracts, the company said it would use new parts and materials. But according to the allegations, Insitu substituted less expensive recycled, refurbished, reconditions and reconfigured parts.
“Taxpayers deserve to get what they paid for – especially in significant no-bid military contracts,” US Attorney Brian Moran said in a news release. “Cases such as this one should be seen as a warning to defense contractors that false claims have no place in military purchasing.”
The settlements resolve allegations that were contained in a federal lawsuit filed by DR O’Hara, a former executive who dealt with pricing for Boeing and Insitu. According to his LinkedIn page, O’Hara left Insitu in 2014 to become a program manager at TIV.
O’Hara’s lawsuit was filed under the whistleblower provisions of the False Claims Act, which permit private individuals to sue on behalf of the government for false claims and share in the recovery of funds.
The federal government intervened in the case, in accordance with the law’s provisions, and the Justice Department said O’Hara will receive $ 4.625 million of the recovered funds.